The bio-psycho-social model forty years later: a critical review


  • Paolo Gritti Ecopsys Collegio Europeo di Scienze Psicosociali, Napoli


Parole chiave:

bio-pscho-social model, review, teoria generale dei sistemib


Since 1997, the Bio-Psycho-Social Model, proposed by George Engel, attracted the interest of clinical researchers as well epistemologists and was recognized as a turning point in the culture and praxis of medical diagnosis and treatments. According to Engel, biological, psychological as well as social events are mutually interconnected and reciprocally influenced; a paradigmatic shift in the approach to the mind-body problem. Lately, this model has received persuasive criticism that has caused a fading of its scientific reliability. This concise review focuses the core feature of Engel’s position as well as the scientific controversy that followed during these forty years.  


I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Adler R.H., (2009), Engel's biopsychosocial model is still relevant today, Journal of Psychosomatic Research 67, 607–611

Bauman Z., (2000), Liquid Modernity, Blackwell Publishers, UK

Baruch G. & Treacher A., (1978), Psychiatry Observed, London: Routledge & Kegan

Benning T. B., (2015), Limitations of the biopsychosocial model in psychiatry, Advances in Medical Education and practice, 6: 347-352

Borrell-Carrió F., Suchman A. L.,Epstein R. M., (2004), The Biopsychosocial Model 25 Years Later: Principles, Practice, and Scientific Inquiry, Ann Fam Med, 2 (6): 576-582

Brenner A. M., (2106), Revisiting the Biopsychosocial Formulation: Neuroscience, Social Science, and the Patient’s Subjective Experience, Acad Psychiatry, 40:740–746

Ebbert J., Montori V. M., Schultz H.J., (2001), The journal club in postgraduate medical education: a systematic review. Med. Teach. 23 (5):455-61

Engel G. L., (1977), The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine, Science 196: 129-136

Engel G. L., (1980), The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model, American Journal of Psychiatry, 137:535-544

Engel G. L., (1997), From biomedical to biopsychosocial: being scientific in the human domain, Psychosomatics, 38:521–528

Evans D. W., Lucas N., Keryy G., (2017), The form of causation in health, disease and intervention: biopsychosocial dispositionalism, conserved quantity transfers and dualist mechanistic chains, Med. Health Care and Philos, (20) 1:1-11

Frankel R., Quill T., McDaniel S. eds, (2003), The Biopsychosocial Approach: Past, Present, Future, University of Rochester Press

Ghaemi S. N., (2010), The Rise and Fall of the Biopsychosocial Model: Reconciling Art and Science in Psychiatry, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

Holland J. C., (2002), History of Psycho-Oncology: Overcoming Attitudinal and Conceptual Barriers, Psychosomatic Medicine, 64:206–221

Kontos N., (2011), Perspective: biomedicine-menace or straw man? Reexamining the biopsychosocial argument, Acad Med; 86:509–15

McLaren N., (1998), A critical review of the biopsychosocial model, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 32:86-9

Pilgrim D., (2002), The biopsychosocial model in Anglo-American psychiatry: Past, present and future?, Journal of Mental Health, 11, 6, 585–594

Shorter E., The history of the biopsychosocial approach in medicine: before and after Engel, in White P., Biopsychosocial Medicine: An integrated approach to understnding illness, Oxford University Press

Smith R. C., Fortin A. H., Dwamena F., Frankel R. M., (2013), An evidence-based patient-centered method makes the biopsychosocial model scientific, Patient Education & Counseling 91, 3:265–270

Suls J. & Rothman A., (2004), Evolution of the Biopsychosocial Model: Prospects and Challenges, Health Psychol. (23), 2:119-125

White P., (2005), Biopsychosocial medicine – an integrated approach to understanding illness, London: Oxford University Press




Come citare

Gritti, P. (2017). The bio-psycho-social model forty years later: a critical review. Journal of Psychosocial Systems, 1(1).



Mini rassegne